Instruments for Studying Coincidence-Anticipation Timing Task – An Updated Systematic Review
Abstract
A coincidence-anticipation timing (CAT) task is used to understanding the human visuo-motor system, which involves how motor control processes information involved in intercepting the moving object. Objective: To update a 2011 systematic review and provide best evidence regarding which instruments are being used to measure CAT tasks. Data Sources: Articles were identified through Web of Science and PubMed databases (search dates, 2011 to June 2017).Study Selection: Two reviewers independently selected studies that used a CAT task. Data Extraction: One reviewer extracted the search result into an Excel spreadsheet through the export option available. Two reviewers independently selected which articles evaluated a CAT task. The selected articles were compared and a new list was generated. The objectives and name of the CAT evaluation instrument were extracted from the selected articles. Data Synthesis: 46 studies in 136 articles were identified: 14studiesused Bassin Anticipation Timer, 18 used a custom computer program (11 different), 7 used a custom apparatus (5 different), and 7 used other commercially available CAT instruments (2 different).None ofthe instruments were specifically validated. Conclusion: The Bassin Anticipation Timer continues to be the most used instrument; however, there are attempts to develop computer-based applications that can replace this instrument.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpesm.v5n1a5
Abstract
A coincidence-anticipation timing (CAT) task is used to understanding the human visuo-motor system, which involves how motor control processes information involved in intercepting the moving object. Objective: To update a 2011 systematic review and provide best evidence regarding which instruments are being used to measure CAT tasks. Data Sources: Articles were identified through Web of Science and PubMed databases (search dates, 2011 to June 2017).Study Selection: Two reviewers independently selected studies that used a CAT task. Data Extraction: One reviewer extracted the search result into an Excel spreadsheet through the export option available. Two reviewers independently selected which articles evaluated a CAT task. The selected articles were compared and a new list was generated. The objectives and name of the CAT evaluation instrument were extracted from the selected articles. Data Synthesis: 46 studies in 136 articles were identified: 14studiesused Bassin Anticipation Timer, 18 used a custom computer program (11 different), 7 used a custom apparatus (5 different), and 7 used other commercially available CAT instruments (2 different).None ofthe instruments were specifically validated. Conclusion: The Bassin Anticipation Timer continues to be the most used instrument; however, there are attempts to develop computer-based applications that can replace this instrument.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpesm.v5n1a5
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 137 |
Yesterday | 117 |
This Month | 4575 |
Last Month | 4274 |
All Days | 1184927 |
Online | 20 |